Friday, November 28, 2014

The Animal Origins of Human Sexuality

I'm waiting for my accounts to be activated at A Voice for Men Forums. I have something I'd like to post there, and to have them put the boots to my proposal, if they should feel there is reason to do so. Here's what I was hoping to post:

What if we consider the natural environment prior to the existence of civilized mankind?
What if, among the many species nature allowed for on this planet at that time, there was one that stood upright, and took advantage of a natural niche where this animal could readily reprogram their own behaviours beyond the baseline of natural behaviours?
What if, despite this advantage, the frailness of this particular species was so great that they needed to be procreating perpetually?
What if nature’s way of keeping a species reproducing constantly was to make the male aroused as frequently as possible, certainly when in the company of females, and for the female to be ready to receive the male?
What if a consequence to this arrangement saw the male prepared to force the female to have sex (rape)?
What if the female, seeking to avoid being raped, chose instead to pre-empt the possibility, and sought out a gentle male to help safeguard her?
What if, as she latched onto her man, she made a point to study him, to learn his habits, his behavours so that she could adapt to them, and eventually present modifications that her partner could adopt to make their relationship mutually workable?
What if the woman came to be valued by her man by coming to know his battles, including his nagging need for sex, and in return, he’d give up most of his powers to her, knowing that he was well-represented in her mind, and that any decision she made for them, respected his needs as well as hers?
What if this trust bestowed on the woman by the man gave her a terrific feeling of importance, of being needed and valued, and though the word did not exist in the primitive mind, to be loved?
What if nature selected for women who had attained this feeling of importance and love, and in order to cement this relationship, rewarded her with a level of arousal that compared to the man’s? This would ensure that couples having reached this level of coherence would have many kids.
What if, conversely, any woman who sought to avoid the whole sexual demand of nature and wanted to be left alone, would spend their lives in constant fear of being raped, would never know the satisfaction of her man making her feel special, and finally, she would not have had a child to bring the profound fulfilment that nature intended?

_______________________________________________________________________

This is what I call the first approximation. It outlines the essential proposition, but lacks detail. The detail makes for a progressively more focussed explanation, but in the process of explaining complex mechanisms, the simplified explanation is the best way to introduce.

If I should see any traction on this site with posts, I'll do my best to explain, even if I need to begin the second approximation of this proposal.

Cheers!

No comments: