What if we consider the natural environment prior to the
existence of civilized mankind?
What if, among the many species nature allowed for on
this planet at that time, there was one that stood upright, and took advantage
of a natural niche where this animal could readily reprogram their own
behaviours beyond the baseline of natural behaviours?
What if, despite this advantage, the frailness of this
particular species was so great that they needed to be procreating perpetually?
What if nature’s way of keeping a species reproducing
constantly was to make the male aroused as frequently as possible, certainly
when in the company of females, and for the female to be ready to receive the
male?
What if a consequence to this arrangement saw the male
prepared to force the female to have sex (rape)?
What if the female, seeking to avoid being raped, chose
instead to pre-empt the possibility, and sought out a gentle male to help safeguard
her?
What if, as she latched onto her man, she made a point to
study him, to learn his habits, his behavours so that she could adapt to them,
and eventually present modifications that her partner could adopt to make their
relationship mutually workable?
What if the woman came to be valued by her man by coming
to know his battles, including his nagging need for sex, and in return, he’d
give up most of his powers to her, knowing that he was well-represented in her
mind, and that any decision she made for them, respected his needs as well as
hers?
What if this trust bestowed on the woman by the man gave
her a terrific feeling of importance, of being needed and valued, and though
the word did not exist in the primitive mind, to be loved?
What if nature selected for women who had attained this
feeling of importance and love, and in order to cement this relationship,
rewarded her with a level of arousal that compared to the man’s? This would
ensure that couples having reached this level of coherence would have many
kids.
What if, conversely, any woman who sought to avoid the
whole sexual demand of nature and wanted to be left alone, would spend their
lives in constant fear of being raped, would never know the satisfaction of her
man making her feel special, and finally, she would not have had a child to
bring the profound fulfilment that nature intended?
_______________________________________________________________________
This is what I call the first approximation. It outlines the essential proposition, but lacks detail. The detail makes for a progressively more focussed explanation, but in the process of explaining complex mechanisms, the simplified explanation is the best way to introduce.
If I should see any traction on this site with posts, I'll do my best to explain, even if I need to begin the second approximation of this proposal.
Cheers!
No comments:
Post a Comment