Thursday, March 16, 2006

The Noises in my Head

I wish I could maintain a worthwhile blog.

I have tons to say, but I'd prefer not to waste your time with anything mundane. I think that if you're going to read MY blog, the least I should do is to offer you something fresh.

OK, so what might that be?

I think that I have a perspective of the world that is unique. It is so because inasmuch as I'm able to do so, I try to view the world in the 'Big Picture' perspective: to consider the events I see around me as symptoms of a history, given specific circumstances.

My most recent investigation has been America, simply because the blogoshere is rife with American concerns. So I've been considering what makes up America.

If you care to click on the Next Blog tab at the top right-hand corner of this page, and rummage through the many blogs, you may note the number of political and military blogs posted by Americans.

If you ask about these posts "What is it of itself" and consider what motivated that person to make that comment, eventually the greater picture that I've been able to glean after looking at many such posts, is that America is a military state.

A significant portion of the American tax dollar goes toward either military associated causes, or directly to the military. Furthermore, it could be argued that the military is America's social assistance program, though there is a chance you may be required to give your life to get some of that benefit.

There are many repercussion anyone can observe that come out of this arrangement; if you're required to tolerate the strict regimen of the military for some portion of your life, you'll only voluntarily accept that if you know that once you've done your duty you'll be largely left alone. This has made Americans very libertarian in their civilian lives.

Also, the freedom to keep and use firearms among the general population, specifically military assault weapons would normally represent a complete failure of a society, however since civilian life can be seen as 'R & R' (rest and recreation) to military life, firearms to this day are viewed as necessary for security, be that personal or national.

The freedoms of civilian life don't end with firearms; remarkably, practically anything of a 'social' nature is denounced as 'socialist', which is only slightly less reviled than 'communist.'

Furthermore, since even the American founding fathers were suspicious of government (see my previous blog), Americans in general don't warm to the co-operative nature of civilization. Often enough, they sneer at the whole concept of working within the law and order, and largely dismiss anything co-operative as 'nanny state.'

From an outsider's perspective, I'd suggest that this arrangement has somewhat arrested social evolution within America, such that while it is the world's superpower, certainly in might, population, and economy, they do not have communities to envy living in: None of their cities make the top dozen.

Another symptom of this arrangement is the bellicose nature of American culture. While a trusted American acquaintance has suggested that this has its roots in the Puritanical origins of America (he'll correct me if I got this wrong), I have more reason to believe this military state arrangement is the reason.

Consider: Regardless of the intellectual capacity of an individual, if he hollers 'Those damned immigrants are ruining this country!' for example, are you going to correct him if he's wearing his service beret and tells you he fought for your freedom? Frankly, you're far more likely to forgive his shortsightedness for the sacrifices he has made on your behalf. I'd suggest that this is the origin of the arrogant presumptuousness that Americans are all too often noted for, however unfairly.

Another problem I have encountered in attempting to discuss socially evolving matters, like urban transit for example, is that Americans often aren't on the same page as you would witness in Europe (or Canada. We have a lot in common with Europe). Who gives a hang about urban transit when we have the car? Oh sure, it pollutes, but so what? Everything pollutes, blah, blah, blah... Too often, serious matters are poopooed for the sake of personal expedience.

If you're an American reading this, please don't take offence: I must emphasize that this is an outsider's perspective, and while I've tried to be as fair and objective as possible, I'll admit that I can be wrong. Please don't hesitate to tell me so, but I'd ask that you might give me some idea why.

Thank you for your patience.

8 comments:

Pissed Off Old Man said...

Right on the mark

Pissed Off Old Man said...

I would even venture further than that I see it as a form of provoked insanity. Most Americans believe the USA leads the world with form of national exceptionalism and virtuous hegemony .

One country under god as if by assumption that we all aren't under some form of god. Bushes ravings about the end of tyranny and the US leading the free world reflects a national megalomania that is only aware of a delusionary bipolarity between the vision and the reality.

Watching Condi Rice last night on TV there is this assumption that the US are here to play this grandiose role in the future of the world. The difficulty those of us outside of the US see with this grandiose vision and role is that the US model doesn't reflect something that many of us feel should be replicated anywhere at all.

These kind of opinions further feed the psychosis, people get labeled anti American , we are reminded of the courageous role it played in WW2, their claim the world would fall apart without a autocratic manipulative US foreign policy. The predict a world of tyranny and enslavement under the exotically projected evil tyrants that the US perceive to be threatening it behind every corner and in most cases helped create in the first place.

My reading of the Muslim / Islamic is that its just the latest manifestation of the pychosis. Rumsfeld and Co basically invented the threat the USSR posed and created a level of national fear that suited their ends. Similarly Joe Macarthy played out a complete paranoid episode in public and took most of the American people along with him.

My view is that the American system has significant instability built into its sociology that if displayed in an individual would be considered mental illness.

American Exceptionlism echoes a collective form Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

NPD is characterized by inflexible, deeply ingrained, maladaptive patterns of adjustment to life that cause either subjective distress or significant impairment of adaptive functioning within the world that they find themselves. I wonder if it's the greater manifestation of Tofflers "future shock" where people become so stressed by a changing world that as a collective they become a dysfunctional culture.

It was Kantor who first described Narcissistic Personality Disorder , when you read through the clinical description its not hard to tick the boxes.

Kantor (1992, pp. 203-204) describes the clinical characteristics of NPD as:

* inordinate self-pride;
* self-concern;
* an exaggeration of the importance of one's experiences and feelings;
* ideas of perfection;
* a reluctance to accept blame or criticism;
* absence of altruism although gestures may be made for the sake of appearance;
* empathy deficit; and,
* grandiosity.

The problem is that most of the worlds people rather than look to the USA for leadership , instead question the sanity of the United States.

I am old school conservative and I can even see this, I remember the debate before we got draggedinot WW2, we didnt want war and we didnt think we were the best. We just wanted to build a great country and provide for our kids future, the war was forced on us and we responded.

But when we got dragged in we responded with everything we had and we helped win it. We didnt wing it by ourselves, most of the people who trumpet on about American power have never been to war. Its paperback power.

Joe Visionary said...

Thank you for your insights. P.O.O.M.

I've been waffling about in this investigation, largely because I'm genuinely concerned that Americans may feel resentful of being criticized.

I'm of the mind that if the 'peculiarities' aren't even acknowledged, there's no point in discussing change.

Your observations on NPD are particularly enlightening, and you're right; the boxes get check off easily.

Your perspective is an important one because you have the benefit of a longer time base, and you can recognize that 'situation normal' today may not have been 'situation normal' in the past.

Thank you for your contribution. I find that many other readers usually don't know quite what to say when they read my blogs because I'm presenting a rare perspective. I'm delighted that I could hit a nerve that would prompt your observations.

Pissed Off Old Man said...

There are allot of folk on the traditonal consright who see this nonsense for what it is "nonsense"!

Bush is not a conservative he uses the Republican party for the dynastic goals of the Neocons.

Hit listen at the top of the following URL

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5290373

Pissed Off Old Man said...

BTW I mean the NPD for both the left and right, my observation is that we have a problem with the American pysche that crosses party lines.

enigma4ever said...

well, I came here after you stumbled over to http://watergatesummer.blogspot.com/ ,
please keep writing and blogging , you have brought up some interesting points...I will be back...

( and I hate what our country has done- it is a mess...)

Karen McL said...

Now why do you consider this a Not-worth-while endeavor?

Or that your word and opinions are *offensive* to Americans. You're not attcking America per-se...just soem of the fringe positions and elements within it.

So keep speaking out and some of us are reading.

:-D

Joe Visionary said...

Thank you, Karen.